GNOIF #3 recap: GNOIF Just Wants To Have Fun (Ladies choice of games)
Games That Got Played: Dominion; Gloom; Forbidden Island; Agricola; Ticket To Ride – Europe
Games That Didn’t Get Played: Mr. Jacket (Pocket); Ticket To Ride (Card Game); Starship Catan; Monty Python Fluxx
The big hit of the night was Forbidden Island, though both Agricola and Ticket To Ride (Europe) got a lot of post-mortem conversation.
We won the Forbidden Island game that I played in. The concept of the game is that the island is sinking, and that you and the other players team up to try to gather four treasures from the island before it completely submerges beneath the sea. The island is represented by 24 tiles, and in the game that I played we had two tiles that were still above water when we escaped the island.
The other group lost their game when a key tile sank early on, splitting the group in two. Eventually a critical treasure tile sank, ending the game. Had that tile not sank they would have won on the next turn!
The 2012 HOF ballot has been released. Here is the list of player for your review:
Jeff Bagwell
Jeromy Burnitz
Vinny Castilla
Juan Gonzalez
Brian Jordan
Barry Larkin
Javy Lopez
Edgar Martinez
Don Mattingly
Fred McGriff
Mark McGwire
Jack Morris
Bill Mueller
Terry Mulholland
Dale Murphy
Phil Nevin
Rafael Palmeiro
Brad Radke
Tim Raines
Tim Salmon
Ruben Sierra
Lee Smith
Alan Trammell
Larry Walker
Bernie Williams
Tony Womack
Eric Young
If I had a vote, it would be Bagwell, McGwire, Palmeiro, Raines, Trammell and Walker. I am not sure any of these guys will get in, but considering the talent that is going to be on the 2013-2017 ballots, this might be the last chance for Larkin, Edgar, Morris, Murphy, Raines, Smith and Trammell to build any real momentum for getting in. Heck, I am pretty sure that if these guys don’t get in on this ballot, they won’t get elected by the BBWAA. Your thoughts? Who gets your vote?
The process is entirely to skewed to hand out bids to the “power” conferences and really goes out of its way to prevent deserving teams from getting into the big bowls in favor of lesser teams from the big conferences. There are 10 spots in BCS bowls – numbers 1 and 2 in the rankings play in the national championship game and there are automatic bids for the Big East, Big 10, Big 12, ACC, SEC and Pac 12 conferences. There are also 2 at-large bids, only one of which goes to a non-AQ conference if it is ranked in the top 10. The only up sides is that no conference can have more than 2 BCS teams, unless the conference winner is not ranked #1 or #2 and the top 2 teams are also from the same conference.
Here is how bad it looks right now:
There are 2 non-automatic qualifier schools currently ranked in the top 10 of the BCS standings – Houston at number 6 , and one of 2 undefeated teams left in college football, and Boise State, who’s only loss this season is by 1 point to the 18th ranked TCU Horned Frogs. Both teams have one game left against tough opponents and if they both win, only one of these teams is going to make it to a BCS bowl game. The other gets to go to a second tier bowl.
The Big East does not have a team currently ranked in the top 25, yet will be sending a team to a BCS bowl. The conference winner has the potential of being the 7-5 Louisville Cardinals, who are in 1st place and their season is done, and could end up there depending on what the teams with remaining games do this weekend.
Thanks to USC being ineligible for post-season play, the inaugural PAC 12 conference championship features the 10-2 Oregon Ducks vs. the 6-6 UCLA Bruins. If somehow UCLA pulls off the upset, you will have a 7-6 team from the PAC 12 in a BCS game.
Right now, the at-large bids are predicted to be Houston and Michigan. Michigan, while 10-2, is currently ranked 16th and didn’t even make it to its conference championship game. How does that make sense?
It gets even stranger with the top 2 teams in the country. Alabama is currently #2 and is done with its season. Its only loss was to #1 Auburn, but they finished second in their division and are not playing in their conference championship game. It is unlikely that Alabama will move from the #2 spot after the games this weekend. Auburn, currently ranked #1, plays #12 Georgia in the SEC championship game this weekend. If Georgia wins, they get a BCS automatic birth. The consensus is that if Auburn loses, they would not drop lower than #2, meaning Alabama moves up to #1 (most likely). This sets up a national championship game where neither of the teams involved won their conference.
I don’t care if they are the 2 best teams in the country. If college football wants to have this stupid setup for a championship and all of these mega conferences with conference championship games, teams should be excluded from playing in the national championship games if they can’t win their conference.
The first Seattle team to “win” will be the team that can get to at least average on offense. I think both teams are at least two years away from that happening.
Saturday morning frittata very loosely based on Alton Brown’s recipe.
4 eggs
1 red pepper, diced
1/4 lb breakfast sausage, broken up
About 1/4 cup each grated cheddar and parmesan.
—-
Cover and heat sausage & red pepper over medium-low heat until cooked. Beat eggs with cheese, salt & black pepper. (It won’t take much salt, both the parmesan and sausage are salty.) Add the egg mixture to the sausage/red pepper and cook covered until the top is almost set, then broil until the top browns a little. (To broil, I slid the frittata out of the non-stick skillet and onto a baking sheet.)
Jamie Oliver’s English Onion Soup, mostly. Using chicken stock and the bread from the “7 Hour Rustic Bread” post to finish. The bread went under the broiler, which seemed to work well enough:
I didn’t really follow his recipe though: 1/2 red onion, thinly sliced. 1/2 large leek, thinly sliced, salt, pepper, and 6 mashed garlic cloves (remove garlic cloves at the end of the “saute”). Cook partially covered over low heat with 2 TBP extra virgin olive oil and 1 TBP butter for about 30 minutes. Remove lid and cook another 20 minutes until everything is brown. Add a 14.5 oz can of chicken stock. Heat through and add 2 TBP of butter to finish. Check for seasoning and fix if needed. Serves 2.
This is another attempt at a “same day rustic bread”. The last batch didn’t get mixed adequately. The recipe is the same as the last time, with some modifications — this recipe uses 1-1/4 tsp salt to 3c flour. (The salt was increased to .42 tsp per cup from .375 per cup.) This was also a 3 cup recipe rather than a one cup recipe, so the crust had time to get much darker — the color it’s supposed to be. There were also some time and handling differences.
Scaled to 1 cup flour
Lahey/Bittman
Reinhart
This Loaf
Flour
ap or bread
bread
bread
Water
.44 cups
.4-.5 cups, cold
.5 cups, cold
Yeast
.08 tsp
.3 tsp
.125 tsp
Salt
.42 tsp
.375 tsp
.42 tsp
Because the dough was underworked on the last try I also decided to incorporate more folding, (only one during fold the last attempt) and the dough got an extra hour of time. I had originally intended for 8 hours with folds every two hours, but other stuff came up:
9 am – Mix dough
11 am – fold (stretch and fold over each direction one time)
1 pm – fold (x2)
2 pm – fold, wait 15 minutes, form into a ball as in the Lahey/Bittman recipe and place seam side down in a floured bowl. (I’m still sticking with trying the bowl, at some point I’ll have to try the towel as in the Lahey/Bittman recipe.)
4 pm -bake as the Lahey/Bittman recipe calls for.
The result:
I think I may have to start slashing these loaves — the bread has cooperated exactly one time getting nice ears and rising like I think it’s supposed to (out of four attempts). Either that, or I need to make sure the seams wind up on top, which is tricky with a dough this wet (of course, I *could* use a towel like the recipe calls for…).
The overall result was better than last time — it may be as a that as a dough with only flour, water, yeast, and salt, that there is a limit to how good a bread can be without an overnight rise or a preferment. I’m going to assume there’s still plenty of room between this dough and whatever that limit is.. The Lahey/Bittman recipe blows it away. It still made a nice turkey melt though:
Vaguely out of focus, but I've already eaten it, so it's too late.
This bread came about as an attempt at a rustic bread that’s “longer- rise- without- having- to- wait- overnight”. It’s rooted in the Lahey-Bittman No Knead Bread, as well as Peter Reinhart’s Pain a l’Ancienne in his book The Bread Baker’s Apprentice.
Both the Lahey and Reinhart breads call for an overnight rise — Lahey’s rise happens on the counter, and Reinhart’s happens in the refrigerator. I wanted to try something similar, shooting for about 6 hours of rising time on the counter. Using Reinhart’s recipe as a jumping off point, here’s where I wound up:
Scaled to 1 cup flour
Lahey/Bittman
Reinhart
This Loaf
Flour
ap or bread
bread
bread
Water
.44 cups
.4-.5 cups, cold
.5 cups, cold
Yeast
.08 tsp
.3 tsp
.125 tsp
Salt
.42 tsp
.375 tsp
.375 tsp
The table above assumes 1-1/3c water to 3c flour for the Lahey bread — the amount of water he uses in his book, “My Bread”. (I’m now using this as the “standard” amount of water for the Lahey/Bittman bread.)
I had started with 1/4 tsp salt — I didn’t want the salt getting in the way of the yeast too much. (It’s a small amount of yeast in these recipes.) I changed course and went with 3/8 tsp because salt helps with gluten structure — I was hoping for a rustic loaf with good volume and large interior holes. (Thank you Jeffrey Hamelman, whose book “Bread – A Baker’s Book of Techniques and Recipes” needs its own “Recommended Cookbook” post.)
Very wet and very shaggy. By any other name, it's a "batter."
I think it’s an interesting point really: When I think I want volume my first thought would normally be “don’t use too much salt, it’ll slow down the yeast and the rise won’t be as high”, when in reality I’m better served using a more “normal” amount of salt and being patient with the yeast — the end result should be a better product.
…back to the recipe — I used the Lahey/Bittman technique as a template: I chose to go with a 4 hour rise, followed by folding the dough and letting it rest 15 minutes, then a final 2 hour rise in a very lightly oiled and floured bowl.
Enough flour to keep it from sticking when turned out? Nope.
For baking, the Lahey/Bittman recipe calls for a temperature of 450F in a dutch oven. Reinhart calls for 475F, on a baking stone that has been preheatead to 500F, for 20-25 minutes total. Reinhart also mists the oven with water to create steam. I chose to go with 450F using the dutch oven, 10 minutes covered and 15 minutes uncovered. The final temperature of the bread was 207F, almost right on the target of 205F.
As for the final result:
Out of the oven -- not very brown on the outside.
And:
I got holey bread, just not the intended result.
What happened:
The bread tasted good and had a good crust. Neither was exceptional, though it worked great for sopping up marina sauce — the flavors of the sauce and bread married very well together.
The finished bread had a fairly light complexion: It was a small loaf (1cup flour), so it didn’t get much uncovered cooking time.
The large irregular holes are a symtom of insufficient mixing or folding. As part of the postmortem I read (in Hamelman’s book) that high hydration doughs need to be folded more times than lower hydration doughs. This dough only got one fold. (Which worked fine for the Lahey bread, but in that case the enzymes had 20 hours to work on the gluten.) Also, the mixer had trouble with the tiny quantity of flour in the bowl, more dragging the dough around rather than kneading.
Next up, an eight hour process, folding every two hours.
The recipe below is from this allrecipes post. I’ve added a few modifications and suggest some other options.
1 3/4 cups whole wheat flour
1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour
3/4 teaspoon salt
1/3 cup vegetable oil [I used canola this time]
1 cup water
salt for sprinkling
[I added some minced rosemary to the dough — other tweaks are suggested below]
——–
1. Preheat the oven to 350 degrees F.
2. In a medium bowl, stir together the whole wheat flour, all-purpose flour, and 3/4 teaspoon salt. Pour in the vegetable oil and water; mix until just blended. [I allow for a 20-minute rest at this point]
3. On a lightly floured surface, roll out the dough as thin as possible – no thicker than 1/8 inch. Place dough on an ungreased baking sheet, and mark squares out with a knife, but don’t cut through. Prick each cracker with a fork a few times, and sprinkle with salt. [I used my kitchenaid pasta roller attachment instead of a rolling pin.]
4. Bake for 15 to 20 minutes in the preheated oven, or until crisp and light brown. Baking time may be different depending on how thin your crackers are. When cool, remove from baking sheet, and separate into individual crackers.
Why this works: The crackers maintain their “snappiness” at least in part because of the key phrase in the recipe above — “mix until just blended.” Working the dough any more than that develops gluten, which makes the crackers unpleasantly chewy instead of the desired result of snappy/crispy. The docking (“pricking with a fork”) prevents the crackers from blowing up like balloons.
Into the oven.
The Mark Bittman recipe posted here uses 2 TBP oil to 1c flour. That’s a 1:8 oil to flour ratio. The recipe above calls for 1/3c oil to 3-1/4c flour — a ratio of about 1:10. Bittman also bakes the crackers at 400F rather than 350F. I think Bittman is basically almost frying the crackers.
The recipe is also flexible — minced rosemary can be added into the dough, or the “sprinkle with salt” step can be augmented with sesame seeds, paprika, poppy seeds, or anything else that sounds good. Peter Reinhart’s “Lavash Crackers” recipe calls for misting the dough lightly before adding the extras. (Reinhart also calls for a 350F bake.)
The completed crackers. More rosemary would have been a good thing.
The Concept: One player plays as Mr. Jack. The other plays as the Inspectors — Holmes, Watson, and Puggsly the Dog. The “board” is a 3×3 grid of tiles. Each tile contains a suspect and an overhead view of alleyways. Mr. Jack begins play as one of the suspects, and the Inspectors circle the board and try to peer down the alleys to get a good look him and the other suspects. If Mr. Jack can stay hidden for long enough, and prevent the Inspectors from eliminating all the other suspects, then Mr. Jack wins. The Inspectors win if they manage to narrow down the suspects to only one, thereby revealing the true identity of Mr. Jack.
Peering down the alleyways.
The “twist” is that the individual tiles can be rotated or exchanged for each other, changing the sightlines into the alleys, and the Inspectors continually move around the perimeter. Both Mr. Jack and the Inspectors share a choice of possible actions each turn, so choosing what to deny the opponent might be equally as important as what you could do yourself instead.
Why I Like It: Mr. Jack takes maybe five minutes to learn but packs a surprising amount of strategy into very few rules. It’s portable, fast to play, and engaging without making people’s brains overheat. It’s a very satisfying little game.