The Final Week Of The NFL Season

By Blaidd Drwg

In the game that means everything for the week, the Seahawks, who despite having a losing record and giving up at least 33 points to opponents in 6 of their last 8 games (the only 2 teams that failed to score that many are Arizona and Carolina – who currently have the 2 worst records in the NFC) have a chance to be the first team without a winning record to win a division in a non-strike year and make the playoffs. I would really like to see the Seahawks win because: I live in Seattle and I really think this will finally make the NFL change their playoff seeding. It seems like every year there is some team that makes the playoffs as the wild card with a significantly better record than the 4th seeded division winner and then gets to play that game on the road. I think that is just stupid. Home field is a pretty significant advantage in the NFL (more on that below) and I don’t think that winning your division should guarantee you that advantage, especially if you are playing a team with a better record.

Can he lead the Seahawks to the promised land of the playoffs?

As for the Hawks chances, well, this is a tough call. They have the home field this week which can be good for them and they are going to be going against a rookie QB which could work to their advantage. The weather, which will probably be bitterly cold probably doesn’t help either team as neither offense if particularly great to being with. I would however like the Seahawks chances a bunch more if they had Hasselbeck starting for them instead of Charlie Whitehurst. My prediction, the Seabirds beat the Sheep 13-10 in an epic suckfest.

The topic of home field has come up a lot in stuff I have read recently. I decided to actually take a look to see how big of an advantage home field really is in the NFL over the last 6 seasons. The numbers played out pretty much the way I expected them to:

Home W Home L PCT
2010 133 107 .554
2009 146 110 .570
2008 147 108 .576
2007 149 107 .582
2006 136 120 .531
2005 151 105 .590

There is definitely a downward trend in home field advantage – Bill Simmons attributes it to all of the new “luxury stadiums” that have been built in the NFL over the last couple of seasons. I think I might have to agree with him (but that is for another post involving much more research). Unless something bizarre happens, like all of the home teams win this week, the win % for home teams will drop again slightly. Still, you have to figure that there is probably about a 5-10% advantage to playing at home versus playing on the road. Basically, you still probably want the home game if you can get it.

In other weird NFL news:
If the Dolphins manage to beat the Patriots this week, they will be guaranteed at least a tie for the best road record in the NFL (The Fish are currently 6-1 on the road). Only the Steelers and Bears have a chance to win 7 on the road this year (they are both currently 6-1). The strange part of that is that they have already locked up the worst home record in the NFL at 1 – 7. Even the truly pathetic Carolina Panthers have won 2 games at home. I would be willing to bet that no team has ever had both the best road record and the worst home record in the same season in NFL history.

You could end up in a situation in the NFC and AFC where a 12-4 team ends up having to play all of their playoff games on the road. In the AFC, if both the Steelers and Ravens win, they end at 12-4 but the Steelers have the tie-breaker, so the Steelers get to take next week off and the Ravens have to go on the road to play (most likely) Indy. In the NFC, if the Saints win and the Falcons win, the Saints get to go on the road as the WC (and play the “winner” of the Seahawks-Rams game) while the Falcons get a 1st round bye and home field throughout the playoffs. If the Saints win and the Falcons lose, the Saints get the bye and the Falcons are the wild card. If we end up with a situation where a 7-9 team gets to host a 12-4 team in the playoffs, the NFL really needs to rethink its seeding.

If I had a Vote…

By Blaidd Drwg

Who will be the next great players to enter the hallowed halls of Cooperstown?

The announcement of the 2011 Hall of Fame class is less than a month away, and it should be interesting the see who, in addition to Blyleven and Alomar, get elected. I looked at the ballot and thought, “Who would I vote for?” I don’t care about any steroid allegations, failed tests, etc. If a player is accused of steroids but nothing in proven, then there is no credible reason to keep him out and if he did fail a test for a banned substance and served a suspension; that is no different than getting caught with a corked bat or scuffed baseball. You can’t pick and choose who you think was clean or dirty in the last 20 years. Voting for the HOF has become a more emotional event for me as the guys who I grew up watching regularly (and playing on my fantasy baseball teams) are now up for election.

If I had a vote, here is who I would cast my 10 ballots for:

Bert Blyleven – It took me a while to warm up to his candidacy, but see my previous post as to why I don’t think he is any worse a selection than Don Sutton or Phil Niekro.
Roberto Alomar – probably the best all-around 2B of the 1990’s and 2000’s. He could hit and field as well as any player. It is a joke that he did not get elected on last year’s ballot.
Alan Trammell – Overshadowed defensively by Ozzie Smith and offensively by Cal Ripken. He also had the misfortune of coming up on the ballot during the peak of the offensive explosion at SS, so his stats just didn’t compare to Jeter/ARod/Garciaparra/Tejada.
Barry Larkin – See also, Alan Trammell.
Tim Raines – Probably the best player in the game from 1981 – 1988 and one of the two greatest leadoff men in BB history. Probably hurt by playing his prime in Montreal and many people remembering the end of his career as a part time player.
Mark McGwire – Steroids or not, he was the Ralph Kiner of his era. He also wasn’t as one dimensional as people think.
Rafael Palmeiro – He was consistently good over a very long period of time with the bat and glove, and, while he did not deserve his Gold Glove in 1999 (playing only 28 games at 1B), he did deserve the ones he won in 1997 and 1998 (and probably should have won at least 2 more before that). Unfortunately, the failed drug test will probably keep him out of the Hall.

How can you deny this goatee induction into the HOF?

Jeff Bagwell – One of the 5 best 1B in baseball history (which is saying a lot) and will probably not be elected (at least not yet) based on steroid speculation. Injuries caused an early retirement, but he was probably the best hitter in the NL for most of the 1990’s and managed to put up an almost identical OPS (966) at the Astrodome (which was a terrible hitter’s park) as he did at Enron Field (995), which is a terrific hitter’s park. Rob Neyer has an interesting take here.
Fred McGriff – I am now realizing he was probably better than I thought originally. Not ever coming up as a potential steroid user probably will help him in the next few votes.
Kevin Brown – See my previous post, he does compare favorably with Don Drysdale. Hurt by pitching his prime in Texas, SD and Florida.

Two guys who I would love to vote for:
Larry Walker and Lee Smith – I doubt Walker will make it past this ballot, he was an amazing player whose injury issues and playing in Coors field mean he will never be elected. Lee Smith might someday get elected, but he was never as dominating as Gossage or Fingers and compiled a ton of cheap saves late in his career. If I voted for either of these guys, it would be completely sentimental.

Two guys who I won’t vote for:
Jack Morris – he just wasn’t that good and pitched with a lot of good teams. A better argument here.
Edgar Martinez – It has nothing to do with the DH argument. I firmly believe that he was probably the best DH in the AL from 1992 to 2001 and that is not easy to do. Had he not been hurt in 1993 and 1994, he might have a better case, but his late start in the majors probably cost him. If you are going to primarily be a hitter, you need to be top 5 in the league for a pretty extended period of time, and he really just wasn’t that. It probably hurts him that he wasn’t the best hitter on his team for that stretch either. I just haven’t heard a compelling argument on why he should be in the Hall.

The complete list of players eligible can be found here.

Let’s Play Spot The Hall Of Famer

By Blaidd Drwg

In the below list of 9 players, can you tell me which ones are in the Baseball Hall of Fame? The list is from baseball-reference.com and is the 162 game average for each of their careers. I will give you a hint – there are 3 guys on this list that are currently in the Hall of Fame. Let’s look at the stats that the majority of the HOF voters would look at.

W-L ERA IP SO ERA+ WHIP K/BB
Player A 14-12 3.31 245 183 118 1.198 2.80
Player B 16-12 3.90 242 157 105 1.296 1.78
Player C 14-13 3.19 232 246 112 1.247 2.04
Player D 14-11 3.26 235 159 108 1.142 2.66
Player E 14-12 3.35 233 144 115 1.268 1.85
Player F 17-10 3.88 215 158 117 1.357 2.34
Player G 14-11 4.24 208 124 104 1.317 2.12
Player H 15-10 3.28 230 169 127 1.222 2.66
Player I 16-10 3.16 229 154 132 1.143 3.37

Did you spot the HOFers? If you guessed C, D, and E (and I am sure you didn’t) then you are right – those are the last 3 starting pitchers elected to the HOF – Nolan Ryan, Don Sutton and Phil Niekro. Not overly impressed? It gets better.

Players A and B are Bert Blyleven and Jack Morris – the two guys whose names come up most often as potential HOFers of the guys who are currently eligible. By this list, they both fit in pretty well with the Ryan/Sutton/Niekro group; heck, Blyleven looks like he might be the best of the bunch of that group. The only real difference between Blyleven/Morris and Ryan/Sutton/Niekro is the wins; neither Blyleven or Morris won 300 games, while the other 3 all did basically by pitching forever. I still think that the only reason Morris is in this discussion is for his pitching in game 7 of the 1991 World Series.

Players F and G are the active equivalents of Blyleven/Morris – Andy Pettitte and Jamie Moyer. Pettitte will probably ultimately make the HOF because he pitched for one of the best teams in the last 15 years (Yankees) and pitched 40+ postseason games (for which his career numbers line up almost exactly with his regular season stats). Jamie Moyer probably won’t make the Hall, and like Morris, has really no business in the HOF discussion other than he was a compiler.

It gets really interesting with Player H – that player is Kevin Brown. Just looking at the list, he is easily better than everyone listed ahead of him. I admit that he doesn’t have the career totals to make the Hall (only managed 211 wins), but was a much more dominating pitcher over his career than Blyleven/Morris/Ryan/Sutton/Niekro/Pettitte/Moyer and probably should have won the 1996 Cy Young Award (he lost to John Smoltz who won 24 games that season, despite an ERA that was a full run lower than Smoltz and an ERA+ of 217). He also pitched his prime in relative obscurity in Texas, Baltimore, Florida and SD before finishing as an overpaid and injured starter for the Dodgers and Yankees. If he pitches for a better team and averages just 2 wins a season over those seasons, he is probably in the Hall of Fame discussion. A fact that you probably didn’t know – Brown still managed to win 59.4% of his decisions over his career.

So who is Player I – I wanted to put in a guy who was easily a first ballot HOFer but not a fire-baller like Clemens and Johnson, just for comparison. Player I is easily be the best player on this list and probably the best pitcher in the NL in the 1990’s – Greg Maddux, who should breeze into Cooperstown with somewhere around 95% of the vote when he is finally eligible in a few years.

Hall of Fame Trivia

By Blaidd Drwg

Because it came up in something that I read, here is an interesting trivia question:

Who was the last starting pitcher* to be voted into the HOF?

*By starting pitcher, I mean a guy who was elected to the Hall on the merits of his pitching as a starter and spent the bulk of his career as a starter.

I will post the answer in the comments.

The Company You Keep, Part 3 (The Free Repeaters)

by A.J. Coltrane

Continued from The Company You Keep, Part 2

A list of the guys who made the bottom 10 QB list two years in a row, and how many passes they attempted in the following year (2007 to present):

Repeater Year Player Passes Thrown The Following Year
2007 Vince Young 36 (Hurt)
2007 Rex Grossman 62
2008 Mark Bulger 247
2009 Mark Bulger 0
2009 JaMarcus Russell 0
2009 Ryan Fitzpatrick 470 (Projected)

For reference, 450-550 passes is about a “full season” for a starting quarterback.

Fitzpatrick is on his 3rd team in five years.  There’s debate in Buffalo as to whether he’s The Guy or not.

I couldn’t find a “Free Repeater” video, here’s one of my other favorites:

The Company You Keep, Part 2

by A.J. Coltrane

Continued from The Company You Keep

What happens to the bottom 10 QB’s the following year?

2009 and 2010 both have 32 quarterbacks with enough attempts to qualify as “regular” players.  Below are the #23-#32 qb’s from 2009 — the right column shows what they’ve done in 2010.

2009 Rank Player QB Rating One Year Later
23 Matt Hasselbeck, QB 75.1 29th
24 Marc Bulger, QB 70.7 Backup, Changed Teams
25 Matt Cassel, QB 69.9 5th
26 Ryan Fitzpatrick, QB 69.7 19th
27 Brady Quinn, QB 67.2 Backup, Changed Teams
28 Mark Sanchez, QB 63.0 28th
29 Matthew Stafford, QB 61.0 Hurt (13th if he qualified)
30 Josh Freeman, QB 59.8 16th
31 Jake Delhomme, QB 59.4 Backup, Changed Teams
32 JaMarcus Russell, QB 50.0 Out Of The League

Sanchez got another shot because he’s young (and because the Jets invested a high pick in acquiring him.)

Hasselbeck started in 2010 too — the Hawks didn’t have any better options.

The other quarterbacks either:

Elevated their games.

or

Got jettisoned by their teams.

—-

Want to have some fun?  Point out to a Jets fan that Sanchez isn’t getting any better.

The Company You Keep

by A.J. Coltrane

The bottom 10 in NFL Quarterback Rating:

Player Rating
Carson Palmer, QB 78.7
Shaun Hill, QB 78.6
Chad Henne, QB 77.6
Donovan McNabb, QB 77.1
Sam Bradford, QB 75.9
Mark Sanchez, QB 74.6
Matt Hasselbeck, QB 73.1
Brett Favre, QB 69.9
Derek Anderson, QB 65.9
Jimmy Clausen, QB 59.1

Two thoughts:

My suspicion is that Charlie Whitehurst looked better when he was further away, rather than up close.

Nobody stays on this list for long.

Triple Doubles With 30+ Points

by A.J. Coltrane

LeBron James put up a 32 point, 11 rebound, 10 assist line on the Knicks a couple of nights ago.  That got me thinking – who’s had the most games with a triple-double and 30 or more points?

My initial thought was “Bird”, reasoning that Magic didn’t score enough to be #1. 

Source – TrueHoop on ESPN:

Player Triple Doubles, 30+ Points
Oscar Robertson 106
Wilt Chamberlain 21
LeBron James 17
Larry Bird 17
Magic Johnson 17
Michael Jordan 16

 

The Big O

Bird’s tied for 3rd with LeBron and Magic.

Oscar Robertson was the last player to average a triple-double over the course of a season.  In his career he had more 30 point triple-doubles than the next five guys combined.

Can’t Touch This:

Queens Of The Stone Age

by A.J. Coltrane

The UConn women’s basketball team defeated Ohio State today, 81-50.  The win gives UConn their 88 straight win, tying them with the 1971-1974 UCLA Bruins.

Some may say women’s basketball doesn’t compare to men’s basketball.

It does — it compares to men’s basketball — of 40 years ago.

————–

[For more on the subject, see Beer Leagues And Major Leagues, posted May 24, 2010.]

In Z we Trust?

By Blaidd Drwg

I have been thoroughly confused by the moves that his Holiness, Jack Z has made over the last few weeks – not as confused as I am with the moves that Wunderkind Theo Epstein has made, but that is for another post. Z’s moves over the last couple of years have really made me wonder if he is the guy we want running this team.

I was ready to write a nice post praising Z for the signing of Jack Cust and trading Jose Lopez. I really like Cust –  yes, he strikes out a ton and yes, he is a butcher in the OF (hey he is no worse than Raul Ibanez ever was), but the guy is a LH power bat who has posted decent numbers in Safeco over his career. More importantly, Cust has great plate discipline and walks a ton, a direction this team really needs to start heading in to be successful. Getting rid of Lopez is addition by subtraction – he can’t hit, he hasn’t met a pitch he didn’t like and he was generally not good defensively. The fact they got a warm body for him was an added bonus. My only question is – does signing Cust mean that Saunders is not going to get regular playing time in LF?

Then Z goes and makes some moves that just are mind blowing.

1) He signs Miguel Olivo for 2 (!) years. Olivo is basically Jose Lopez but a catcher – he swings at everything, hits for occasional power and really is not considered a good fielder. The Mariners moved him a few years ago when he was younger because he couldn’t hit and the pitchers hated throwing to him. I am pretty sure nothing has changed. And before you point out his decent production over the last few seasons – I would like to point out that 3 of those 5 seasons came in the NL, he posted an OPS+ greater than 100 only once and his walk totals in those 5 season were 9, 14, 7, 19 and 27 – every one of those seasons he racked up at least 360 plate appearances.

2) He trades for Brendan Ryan. Ryan is a spare part – a Josh Wilson kind of guy who can play 3 IF positions, none extraordinarily well, but well enough and can hit a little, but you are probably asking for trouble if you give him north of 300 plate appearances. I fundamentally have no problem with getting Ryan, they gave up a guy who probably will never make the majors for him; it is what they are planning to do with Ryan that makes no sense – make him a starter. How many Jack Wilson/Josh Wilson/Matt Tuisasosopo guys do you need on your roster – they are all interchangeable parts and carrying 3 or 4 of them will really limit your team – how does it benefit you if you have 3 guys who all can do the same thing with the same basic abilities.

3) Releasing Rob Johnson. I have no love for Johnson – he can’t handle the pitchers very well, he has trouble with keeping the ball in front of him (as evidenced by the 9 PB in 61 games last year), hasn’t shown that he can hit MLB pitching and really shouldn’t be a starter. He is 28 and probably primed for his best career season, is making close to league minimum and has shown that he can hit in the minors. You are telling me that you had to DFA him instead of finding someone that would be willing to take him for a warm body? They needed to clear a roster spot for Jack Cust, but I don’t understand dumping a catcher. Someone will end up signing him.

The Mariners are going to have to make another move when Olivo officially signs. I can only hope that they guy they get rid of is one of the Jack Wilson/Josh Wilson/Matt Tuisasosopo three headed monster.